The Dangerous ‘Lame Duck’ Congress

Photo Credit: Gary Locke

Photo Credit: Gary Locke

An increasing number of political analysts are realizing that liberals may force the remainder of their anti-American agenda down the throats of the American people during a lame duck session of Congress after the November 2010 elections.  Today, Fred Barnes offers his thoughts at The Weekly Standard.

Running on Empty

The wheels come off the liberal juggernaut, but it’s still dangerous.

BY Fred Barnes

June 28, 2010, Vol. 15, No. 39

The Obama presidency is nearly out of gas. So are the Democratic majorities in the Senate and House. Yet the White House and congressional Democrats aren’t surrendering. They’re still intoxicated with their “historic majorities” and bent on enacting more landmark liberal legislation this year, including cap and trade, a value-added tax (VAT), and who knows what else.

Are they fantasizing? Not entirely. The odds—and the political climate—are against them. But their ideological ambitions are undiminished and they have a sense of urgency. They know their majorities will be crippled (if not eliminated) in the midterm elections on November 2, which means they must enact the remaining parts of the agenda in 2010 or put them back in the cupboard of liberal dreams, maybe for decades. So it’s now or never.

There are two time slots for passing these bills, both difficult. The first is between now and whenever Congress recesses in the fall. Prospects look bleak in this time frame for approving anything except the final version of the financial reform bill. The second is when a lame duck Congress, filled with defeated and retired senators and House members, convenes in December.

Read the entire post here.


Make a Comment